Valuein
Developer & quant data APIs

Valuein vs Polygon.io

Polygon owns market data — Valuein owns auditable SEC fundamentals.

Polygon.io is a best-in-class market-data provider (real-time + historical prices, WebSocket, great SDKs). Its fundamentals are a secondary product sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL. Valuein is the inverse: fundamentals are the entire product, with deeper history, a survivorship-free universe, and fact-level provenance.

Start free — no cardSee pricing
pip install valuein-sdk

At a glance

The short version, including where Polygon.io is the better pick.

The key difference

Polygon is the right tool for prices and real-time market data, and it even advertises point-in-time fundamentals with field-level traceability. Valuein goes deeper on the fundamentals themselves: 1993 history, a survivorship-free delisted universe, audited ratios, smart-money and forensic tools, and a fact_id that resolves to the source filing — fundamentals as the core, not an add-on.

Where Valuein leads

Real-time prices & market data: Not our focus — pair with a price feed.

Where Polygon.io is stronger

Polygon's real-time and historical market data (prices, WebSocket) is far ahead — we don't compete there

Best for

Developers and quants who already have a market-data feed (or use Polygon for it) and need deep, auditable, survivorship-free SEC fundamentals for research and AI agents.

Outcomes that matter

What you get done, not just a feature checklist.

  • Real-time prices & market data

    Valuein
    Not our focus — pair with a price feed
    Polygon.io
    Best-in-class real-time + WebSocket
  • Deep fundamentals backtest

    Valuein
    1993 → present, survivorship-free
    Polygon.io
    ~10 years, fundamentals are secondary
  • Audit any number an agent returns

    Valuein
    fact_id → exact SEC filing
    Polygon.io
    Field-level XBRL traceability on fundamentals
  • Entry price

    Valuein
    $0 free tier, then $49/mo
    Polygon.io
    Free, then $29–$199/mo (verified)

Feature comparison

Grouped by what you are trying to do. Scroll sideways on a phone.

Valuein compared with Polygon.io, feature by feature
FeatureValueinPolygon.io
Data integrity and audit
Survivorship BiasAll delisted companies includedNot advertised for fundamentals
Standardization350+ standard concepts + audited ratiosXBRL fundamentals, fewer derived ratios
Per-fact Audit Trailfact_id → SEC filingField-level traceability on XBRL
Agents and workflow
AI Agent AccessMCP + agent-safety guardrailsOfficial MCP server
Coverage and depth
Fundamentals Depth1993 → present, core product~10 years, secondary to market data
Smart MoneyInsider + 13F + forensic audit toolsNot a focus
Access and pricing
FormatParquet bulk + SDK + MCPREST/WebSocket + official SDKs

Polygon.io details and pricing are based on publicly available information as of June 2026 and may have changed; verify on their site. Where a competitor's figure is vendor-reported or estimated, we say so.

Which one should you choose?

Choose Valuein if you need

  • Real-time prices & market dataNot our focus — pair with a price feed
  • Deep fundamentals backtest1993 → present, survivorship-free
  • Audit any number an agent returnsfact_id → exact SEC filing
  • Entry price$0 free tier, then $49/mo

Choose Polygon.io if

  • Polygon's real-time and historical market data (prices, WebSocket) is far ahead — we don't compete there
  • Polygon's developer experience (official Python/JS/Go SDKs) is excellent and mature
  • Polygon already advertises point-in-time fundamentals + field-level traceability, so PIT alone isn't our edge against them

Switching takes minutes

Install the SDK and read a company with no token and no card: the free sample runs the same code your plan will. Add a key later and nothing else changes.

valuein_sdkpython
from valuein_sdk import ValueinClient with ValueinClient() as client: # What a ticker or CIK resolves to. A CIK also reaches delisted companies. print(client.resolve(["AAPL", 320193]))  # One company's rows from a table, with the point-in-time filter applied. facts = client.read_table( "fact", tickers="AAPL", columns=["standard_concept", "period_end", "fiscal_period", "numeric_value"], limit=10, ) print(facts)  # Named SQL templates. Pass parameters as keyword arguments. print(client.list_templates()[:5]) df = client.run_template("fundamentals_by_ticker", ticker="AAPL") print(df.head())  # Links to the SEC filings behind the numbers. links = client.filing_links("AAPL", form_types=["10-K"], limit=3) print(links[["form_type", "filing_date", "document_url"]])  # Restatement Radar: figures a later filing changed (every plan). changed = client.restatements(ticker="AAPL", limit=5) print(changed[["standard_concept", "period_end", "first_value", "current_value", "disclosure_class"]])

Frequently asked questions

Should I use Valuein or Polygon?

Use Polygon for prices and real-time market data. Use Valuein when SEC fundamentals are the job — deep history, survivorship-free delisted names, audited ratios, smart-money signals, and fact-level provenance for AI agents. Many users run both.

Polygon also claims point-in-time fundamentals — why switch?

Against Polygon the differentiator isn't PIT itself, it's depth and auditability: 1993 history vs ~10 years, a survivorship-free universe, audited ratios, and a fact_id that resolves to the exact filing for one-click verification.

See all Valuein comparisons

Try it on your own ticker.

Start with the free sample. No card, no sales call; pricing is public.